Genetics Disease Research Project

 

NAME:_____________________________________________________________PERIOD:_______

           

Text Box: /50               

DISEASE POSTER GRADING RUBIC

 

Text Box: / 20 CONTENT              

                 

·     The poster includes all important information.

 

 

 

·    The information on the disease is correct.

·     The poster is missing some important information.

 

·     Most of the information on the disease is correct.

·   The poster is missing important information.

 

 

 

·  The information on the disease is not correct.

Text Box: /20 VISUALLY APPEALING

 

·    The poster is neat and organized.

·    The poster is typed with nice boarders when needed.

·    The poster looks professional.

·    The words on the poster are appropriate font size and are not too wordy.

·    The poster is mostly neat and organized.

·    The poster is not always typed with nice boarders when needed.

·    The poster looks mostly professional.

·    The words on the poster are mostly appropriate font size and are usually not too wordy.

·    The poster is not neat and organized.

·    The poster is not typed with nice boarders when needed.

·    The poster does not look professional.

·    The words on the poster are either inappropriate font size or are too wordy.

Text Box: /5 PICTURES

 

·    Includes pictures that add to the understanding of the disease.

·    Missing some important pictures that would have added to the understanding of the disease

·    No pictures.

Text Box: /5 REFERENCES LIST

 

·    References are typed in the correct format.

 

·    References include a minimum of 5 sources

·    References are typed but not all are in the correct format.

·    References include 3-4 sources.

·    References are not typed or in the correct format.

 

·    References are not included or only include 1-2 sources.

Explain how each member contributed to making this poster: _________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Content:

·        Center:                                                             *  Left:

o       Introduction (center)                                         *  Information about

o       Information about the disease                                current research

o       Genetics of disease                                 *  Right:

o       Etc.                                                                  *  Exceptions and exemptions

    to Mendelian Inheritance

*  Bibliography

 

NAME:_____________________________________________________PERIOD:____

 

 

Text Box: /50               

DISEASE PRESENTAITON GRADING RUBIC

 

CONTENT/

KNOWLDEGE

/ 25
 
       

                

    

      

·    The presentation includes all important information.

·    The information presented on the disease is correct.

 

·    The research is presented, is understandable and is in 1st person.  Its relevance is explained.

·    The presenter is knowledgeable on their disease and can answer questions.

·    The presentation missing some important information

·    The information presented on the disease is mostly correct.

·    The research is presented, is mostly understandable and is in 1st person.  Relevance is not explained.

·     The presenter is knowledgeable on their disease and can answer most questions.

·    The presentation missing information.

·    The information presented on the disease is not correct.

 

·    The research is either not presented or is not understandable if presented (no relevance)

·  The presenter is not knowledgeable on their disease and cannot answer questions.

 

DELIVERY

/20
 

·    The presentation is well organized and easy to follow and understand.

·    The presenters look professional.

·    The presenters use good body language (eye contact, poise, etc.) for the entire presentation.

·    The presentation is engaging and interesting (atheistic and good projection).

 

·    The presenters know their material (have practiced), know their role, and are able to deliver the presentation without reading their notes.

·    The presentation is organized and somewhat easy to follow and understand.

 

·    The presenters use good body language (eye contact, poise, etc.) for most of the presentation.

·    The presentation is mostly engaging and interesting (enthusiastic and good projection).

·    The presenters do not know their material well enough, practice is not obvious, or they don’t have clearly defined roles, or read off of their notes instead of talking with the audience.

·    The presentation is  not well organized and/or is difficult to follow and understand.

·    The presenters do not look professional.

·    The presenters do not use good body language (eye contact, poise, etc.) throughout the presentation.

·    The entire presentation is not  as engaging and interesting as it should be.

 

·    The presenters do not know their material well enough, practice is not obvious, they don’t have clearly defined roles, and they read off of their notes instead of talking with the audience.

/5
 
TIME LIMIT

 

·    The presentation stays within the 5 minute time limit.

 

·    The presentation goes over the 5 minute time limit